{"id":3427,"date":"2021-08-10T23:32:00","date_gmt":"2021-08-10T21:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webdev.atsec.us\/?p=3427"},"modified":"2024-07-24T23:33:17","modified_gmt":"2024-07-24T21:33:17","slug":"do-remote-site-visits-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webdev.atsec.us\/do-remote-site-visits-work\/","title":{"rendered":"Do Remote Site Visits Work?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

While the home office has become a normality for many IT companies and operations during the pandemic, the requirements for security evaluation, certifications, accreditations, and other approvals have remained constant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Site visits at the development sites are required to achieve the approval of certification and accreditation. How could this be accomplished when developers, auditors, and certifiers were located in different countries and were working from home?

In addition, there were multiple travel restrictions with varying rules in each country.

How did we do site visits for EAL3+ Common Criteria evaluations and NESAS audits?
How was atsec re-accredited from the national agency, and how did we maintain the level of certification for ISO 9000, ISO 27001, and other accreditation our lab must carry to provide evaluation services when an auditor from these agencies had to be on-site while our atsec colleagues worked from home?
 
We performed and received these site visits remotely!
 
Special “remote site-visit” rules were provided both by the SOG-IS for CC evaluations and GSMA for NESAS audits<\/a> to allow remote site visits temporarily.

During the first remote site visits, the developers, auditors, and certifiers were skeptical. The main concern regarded the effectiveness of such an examination method in determining:<\/p>\n\n\n\n